![\"program](\"https:\/\/ulici.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/programcopii.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Droit de la famille \u2014 151179<\/a>, 2015 QCCA 923<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2015-05-27<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00cen apel, Curtea a anulat o hot\u0103r\u00e2re privind custodia exclusiv\u0103, concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103 o simpl\u0103 dorin\u021b\u0103 exprimat\u0103 de un copil nu constituie o schimbare material\u0103 care s\u0103 justifice modificarea \u0219i a subliniat importan\u021ba lu\u0103rii \u00een considerare a tuturor circumstan\u021belor, inclusiv a stabilit\u0103\u021bii \u0219i unit\u0103\u021bii familiei, \u00een interesul superior al copilului.<\/p>\n\n\n\n _______________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 22230<\/a>, 2022 QCCA 210<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2022-02-14 <\/p>\n\n\n\n Curtea a anulat o hot\u0103r\u00e2re judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 prin care se acorda custodia exclusiv\u0103 a copiilor unuia dintre p\u0103rin\u021bi, din cauza unei analize insuficiente a criteriilor pentru custodia partajat\u0103. A dispus custodia comun\u0103, constat\u00e2nd c\u0103 au fost stabilite capacit\u0103\u021bile parentale ale ambelor p\u0103r\u021bi \u0219i c\u0103 aceast\u0103 solu\u021bie servea mai bine intereselor copiilor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ______________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille – 071132<\/a>, 2007 QCCA 697<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2007-05-16 <\/p>\n\n\n\n Instan\u021ba a confirmat custodia exclusiv\u0103 a copilului de c\u0103tre tat\u0103, subliniind necesitatea de continuitate \u0219i stabilitatea copilului, dar a dispus \u0219i dreptul de vizit\u0103 supravegheat pentru mam\u0103 din cauza tulbur\u0103rilor sale de personalitate \u0219i a riscului de dezorganizare a vie\u021bii copilului.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ______________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 172882<\/a>, 2017 QCCA 1920<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2017-12-05<\/p>\n\n\n\n Apelul privind custodia copilului este admis. Instan\u021ba constat\u0103 c\u0103 judec\u0103torul de fond a acordat o importan\u021b\u0103 dispropor\u021bionat\u0103 capacit\u0103\u021bii lingvistice a unui p\u0103rinte, neglij\u00e2nd al\u021bi factori esen\u021biali pentru interesul superior al copilului, inclusiv stabilitatea \u0219i leg\u0103turile familiale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ______________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 211027<\/a>, 2021 QCCA 966<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2021-06-11 <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00cen apel, Curtea a confirmat custodia exclusiv\u0103 a copiilor de c\u0103tre mam\u0103, a respins argumentele care invoc\u0103 o eroare procedural\u0103 \u0219i a men\u021binut supravegherea drepturilor de vizit\u0103 ale tat\u0103lui din cauza preocup\u0103rilor legate de maturitatea acestuia, consumul de alcool \u0219i v\u00e2rsta fraged\u0103 a copiilor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ___________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 122746<\/a>, 2012 QCCA 1782<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2012-10-03<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00centr-un caz de drept de rela\u021bii personale la minor, instan\u021ba acord\u0103 unui p\u0103rinte necustodian drepturi largi de ie\u0219ire din familie, afirm\u00e2nd c\u0103 men\u021binerea unei rela\u021bii semnificative cu ambii p\u0103rin\u021bi este \u00een interesul superior al copilului. Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 ini\u021bial\u0103 este par\u021bial anulat\u0103 din cauza unei analize eronate a neglij\u0103rii p\u0103rinte\u0219ti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 201396<\/a>, 2020 QCCA 1229<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2020-09-25 <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00cen materie de custodie a copilului, apelantul nu a dovedit modific\u0103ri semnificative de natur\u0103 s\u0103 afecteze nevoile fundamentale ale copilului. Instan\u021ba a respins instituirea custodiei comune datorit\u0103 importan\u021bei p\u0103str\u0103rii stabilit\u0103\u021bii pentru copil, dar a ajustat dreptul de rela\u021bii \u00een consecin\u021b\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n _____________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 18888<\/a>, 2018 QCCA 660<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2018-04-25<\/p>\n\n\n\n Curtea confirm\u0103 c\u0103 interesul superior al copilului, evaluat \u00een lumina capacit\u0103\u021bii parentale, a stabilit\u0103\u021bii \u0219i impactului mut\u0103rii acestuia, justific\u0103 acordarea custodiei p\u0103rintelui care r\u0103m\u00e2ne la domiciliul actual al familiei. <\/p>\n\n\n\n ___________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 20473<\/a>, 2020 QCCA 482<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2020-03-25<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00cen apel, Curtea a confirmat decizia de a acorda custodia exclusiv\u0103 a copiilor unuia dintre p\u0103rin\u021bi pe parcursul anului \u0219colar, pe baza limbii de predare, a stabilit\u0103\u021bii oferite \u0219i a dificult\u0103\u021bilor legate de dreptul de vizit\u0103 al p\u0103rin\u021bilor. Curtea a concluzionat c\u0103 interesele copiilor au prevalat, f\u0103r\u0103 nicio eroare semnificativ\u0103 \u00een analiza criteriilor aplicabile.<\/p>\n\n\n\n __________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 172050<\/a>, 2017 QCCA 1325<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2017-09-06 <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00cen apel, Curtea a respins cererea de modificare a acordurilor privind custodia, concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103 absen\u021ba unei schimb\u0103ri semnificative \u00een situa\u021bia copiilor nu justific\u0103 interven\u021bia, \u00een ciuda progreselor \u00eenregistrate de p\u0103rintele reclamant. Persisten\u021ba dificult\u0103\u021bilor de comunicare r\u0103m\u00e2ne incompatibil\u0103 cu interesul superior al copiilor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n _________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 20117<\/a>, 2020 QCCA 150<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2020-01-28 <\/p>\n\n\n\n Instan\u021ba a admis apelul unui tat\u0103 prin care se solicita extinderea drepturilor de rela\u021bii personale cu fiul s\u0103u, concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103 respingerea nejustificat\u0103 de c\u0103tre judec\u0103torul de fond a unei evalu\u0103ri psihosociale a constituit o eroare de drept. Drepturile de rela\u021bii personale cu tat\u0103l au fost majorate \u00een conformitate cu recomand\u0103rile ini\u021biale ale expertului.<\/p>\n\n\n\n _____________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille – 21860<\/a>, 2021 QCCA 810<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2021-05-13 <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00centr-un caz de dreptul familiei, instan\u021ba a stabilit custodia comun\u0103 dup\u0103 ce a constatat o schimbare semnificativ\u0103 \u00een situa\u021bia copiilor. Evaluarea veniturilor apelantului a fost ajustat\u0103, lu\u00e2nd \u00een considerare un procent din profiturile nerepartizate ale afacerilor sale pentru a determina cuantumul pensiei alimentare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ______________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 211295<\/a>, 2021 QCCA 1132<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2021-07-12<\/p>\n\n\n\n Instan\u021ba a confirmat custodia exclusiv\u0103 a copiilor de c\u0103tre intimat\u0103, concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103 dorin\u021bele copilului mai mare, implicarea mai mare a p\u0103rin\u021bilor \u0219i continuarea nesepar\u0103rii fra\u021bilor \u0219i surorilor servesc intereselor lor superioare. Apelul privind custodia a fost respins, dar a fost acordat\u0103 o reducere minor\u0103 a costurilor speciale de \u00eentre\u021binere<\/p>\n\n\n\n ______________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 19137<\/a>, 2019 QCCA 199<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2019-02-06 <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00cen apel, se men\u021bine respectul fa\u021b\u0103 de decizia judec\u0103torului de fond de modificare a aranjamentelor privind custodia, concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103 nicio modificare propus\u0103 nu ar cauza inconveniente grave copiilor. Absen\u021ba oric\u0103rei erori manifeste sau de principiu justific\u0103 respingerea apelului.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ___________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 24454<\/a>, 2024 QCCA 391<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2024-04-02<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00cen materie de custodie a copilului, Curtea a confirmat un program parental comun\u0103, aliniat\u0103 cu interesul superior al copilului s\u0103n\u0103tos, \u00een ciuda consecin\u021belor care limiteaz\u0103 leg\u0103turile dintre fra\u021bi \u0219i sora sa cu dizabilit\u0103\u021bi grave. <\/p>\n\n\n\n ____________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 092403<\/a>, 2009 QCCA 1881 (CanLII)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2009-10-05<\/p>\n\n\n\n Curtea respinge apelul \u00eempotriva unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u0219ti referitoare la custodia copilului, constat\u00e2nd c\u0103 afirma\u021biile apelantului nu demonstreaz\u0103 necesitatea unei interven\u021bii \u00een interesul copiilor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ______________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n Droit de la famille \u2014 172133<\/a>, 2017 QCCA 1395 (CanLII)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court of Appeal of Quebec \u2014 Quebec<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2017-09-14<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00centr-o situa\u021bie de custodie partajat\u0103, Curtea a respins apelul privind relocarea copiilor. Judec\u0103torul de fond, a decis \u00een interesul superior al copiilor. Nu exista niciun temei pentru interven\u021bie \u00een absen\u021ba unei erori de drept sau a unei erori manifest\u0103 \u00een aprecierea faptelor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n